Recent Posts Recent Comments
Categories Archives

Posts Tagged ‘S5763-2011’

Catharine Young Doesn’t Have the Skills to Pass the Bills

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Two pro-landlord rent regulation bills, which were introduced by Senator Catharine Young last year and passed the Senate, have died in Assembly and will not see a vote.

S5041 – This bill would have given landlords the ability to evict rent stabilized tenants if they fail to file a city/state tax return, or voted in the wrong place, and also would have allowed a landlord to challenge a tenant’s primary residency at any time during the lease.

S5763 – This bill would have reversed the tenants’ victory in the Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties case, by allowing landlords who illegally deregulated apartments (while simultaneously receiving J-51 tax benefits) to return those benefits to the government. By doing so, the landlords would be able to set the legal stabilized rent on the affected apartments, and avoid paying their tenants any potential retroactive damages that the court might determine the tenants are owed. Since this bill passed the Senate, the court has ruled that the landlords do in fact owe their tenants retroactive damages, so this bill would have been a huge victory for landlords had it become law.

Senate Passes 2 of Catharine Young’s Anti-Tenant Bills

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

In today’s Senate session, Catharine Young debated her latest pro-landlord bill S5763 against senators Daniel Squadron, Thomas Duane, Liz Krueger, and Adriano Espaillat, who represent various districts of New York City which are targeted by the bill.

The goal of the bill is to allow landlords who illegally deregulated rent stabilized apartments (while simultaneously receiving J-51 tax benefits) to return those benefits to the government, thereby keeping the rent that they overcharged their tenants.

The property most notably affected by this bill is Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village, whose tenants won a major court victory against their landlords in 2009 regarding several years of illegally overcharged rent (Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties). This bill would reverse the court’s decision and hand victory back to the billionaire landlords.

Young had tried the same thing earlier this year with a similar bill S4117A, but that bill failed to gain any traction. (33:50 in video)

Catharine Young later went on to debate her bill S5041 (with the help of her fellow Republican senators Michael Nozzolio and Carl Marcellino) against Krueger, Espaillat, and Gustavo Rivera. This bill would give a landlord the power to evict a rent regulated tenant by claiming that the tenant failed to properly file a tax return or voted in the wrong place. By shifting the burden of proving primary residency to the tenant, the tenant’s rights to due process would be greatly reduced. (2:12:57 in video)

As usual, Catharine Young’s own constituents are not affected by either of these bills in any way. In spite of this fact, both bills were passed by the Senate (34-28) and now move to the Assembly.